MFJ-1026

For Those Who Have S7 to S9 Noise on HF:

For two decades I lived as a cliff dweller in both city and beachfront high-rise condos before moving back into a single-family home 15 miles from the White House four years ago. In all of those locations, the noise would average S7 to S9 – virtually wiping out HF.

MFJ-1026

MFJ-1026

I solved this problem with the MFJ-1026 noise canceling gizmo. I even had two of these – one for each of my FT-991 transceivers. With the right noise antenna, by kicking these suckers on, my noise level would very consistently drop to S1 to S3! Phenomenal gizmo!
 
Notice that I stressed “right noise antenna” – if you don’t do this right, you will not see any improvement. What usually worked well for me was a simple 20m dipole. During my cliff dweller days, I had a variety of stealth antennas on my balconies including my best performer: the MFJ 1786 magnetic loop antenna.
 
(https://k3rrr.com/mfj-1786-loop-antenna-my-stealth…/)
 
For the noise antenna, I would run an extra coax out the door for the small 20m dipole that would be located on the other end of the balcony. For our current single-family dwelling, the 20 m dipole is right above me in the attic. Your mileage may vary – and you may be able to get away with a much smaller noise antenna than even a small 20 m dipole. The secret is that you want your noise antenna to hear the same noise that your main antenna is hearing – with more focus on the noise than the signals you want to hear.
 
Unfortunately, the MFJ 1026 only covers HF and not VHF and UHF. However, for HF, this gizmo is worth its weight in gold. However, this is old technology with no newer technology that I know of that does the job. If you are burdened with HF noise, I highly recommend this box.
 

Robert

PS: I bought both of mine off eBay for about $110 each …BTW, the telescoping whip antenna was a joke with zero help with any of my noise….ever. Note that a lot of reviews of this gizmo are negative – probably because they did not set up the right noise antenna – maybe believing that the whip antenna would actually work.

Another BTW: an internal switch controls whether the whip is used…I found essentially the same non-results no matter the internal switch setting – but that may have a lot to do with my particular noise sources. If your noise is inside the shack, the whip with the internal switched set to the whip, might even help.

-.- …– .-. .-. .-.
73 de Robert K3RRR
K3RRR.com <~~~~~~~~~~ Visit My Web Site
@K3TripleR <~~~~~~~~~~ Follow Me On Twitter
YouTube.com/K3RRR <~~ Check Out My Videos
-.- …– .-. .-. .-.

End of Daytime HF?

On 05/04/2018 09:27 AM, Robert Bruninga wrote the following comment on the AMSAT BBS Reflector. He mentioned that it was the only mailing list he was subscribed to and wanted to get out this warning that, in his opinion, the end of daytime HF contacts on the ham radio bands may be just around the ham radio corner. 

I don’t know about you but when Bob Bruninga WB4APR says something, I tend to listen and give him the benefit of the doubt.

FWIW, I share these comments here so that his thoughts on this subject might be more readily picked up by Uncle Google et al so Bob’s ideas get better coverage.

73 de Robert K3RRR   

PS: I don’t know about you but I already have intermittent but significant QRN on 2m that too often interfere with my satellite contacts. My intuition tells me the same problem that Bob talks about is only going to exacerbate satellite reception also…

—————————————

“I don’t want to be an alarmist, but we need the Hams with the proper knowledge to get involved in this disturbing news.

“The National Electric Code now requires electronics on every module of a solar array communicating via signaling on the DC power lines to assure EACH pair of panels can shut down independently.  This is to make all possible faults never allow more than 80 volts anywhere in the system. This is effective 1 Jan 2019.

“This is the nail in the coffin of simple DC series string arrays which are the quietest systems and almost demands  or optimizers on every panel.  Refer to the QST article a few years ago about how disastrous optimizers are to RFI and HF operations with modules all over the roof…

“Here is the Solar news:

“Also, what is going to happen to an array that has signaling all over it in the near field of HF?

“Although you can avoid it by going solar before then, you may have problems when your neighbors go later.

“I hate to be an alarmist but we all know what happens when ham radio and commercial systems are incompatible and even though Ham radio might be in the right, we are only 1 in 600 and no one is going to side with us.

“We took on broadband over power and squelched that dumb idea, but now this has the potential for equal demise of Ham radio.  It should be fixable, but we also know that there is high competition in the solar market and the modules that are made the cheapest will be popular and will likely not be adequately filtered.

“Sorry for posting to the AMSAT-bb but it is the only HAM email reflector I subscribe to.

“If nothing else, we need to find out what systems are terrible emitters and nip them in the bud.  Maybe all it takes is driving by solar systems you see and turning on your AM radio on a weak signal channel and seeing if the background noise peaks near that home.  But also it has individual peaks, so it might also be nice to tune around too find the max and then check the range.  I find the noise can go hundreds of feet along the power lines….

“You can’t miss ‘em… just sounds like a 60 Hz buzz on all the harmonics of the inverter switching frequency.”

Bob WB4APR