Resonant wave runup

1. 

   robotnikkkk says:

   January 11, 2015 at 8:07 AM

   @dutykh =HE SAYIN ABOUT U DEALIN WITH NOTHING AND IN REAL LIFE RESONANCE
   BECOMING NOT ON EACH WAVE MAYBE THROUGH 4-10 AND U SHOULD SIT ON SEA SHORE
   AND LOOKUP MORE FOR REAL WAVES’ MOVEMENT

   Reply
2. 

   robotnikkkk says:

   January 11, 2015 at 7:09 AM

   =HMMMMMMMM =MODEL OF COURSE INTERESTING BUT HOW TO USE THOSE RESULTS ON
   PRACTICE IS MOSTLY GENERAL QUESTION =TO FOR EXAMPLE PRESUME WHERE TSUNAMI
   WILL B MORE DANGEROUS AND WHERE NOT AND WHAT MUST TO B DONE TO REDUCE
   TSUNAMI’S POWER =STILL THAT MODEL SAYING ABOUT NOTHING

   Reply
3. 

   Denys Dutykh says:

   January 11, 2015 at 6:12 AM

   @lookang What do you mean the simulation ? This animation was obtained ‘in
   silico’ as a result of a numerical simulation.

   Reply
4. 

   Denys Dutykh says:

   January 11, 2015 at 5:50 AM

   @trich0m0nada Thanks a lot for your comments. You seem to have sharp ideas
   about the run-up process. Why not to try to publish them?

   Reply
5. 

   lookang lawrence wee says:

   January 11, 2015 at 4:51 AM

   thanks. is the simulation available too?

   Reply
6. 

   Denys Dutykh says:

   January 11, 2015 at 3:59 AM

   @lookang Ok, I see now what you mean. Actually, we didn’t share these
   Matlab scripts. The main reason is that the run-up technology is well
   mastered among the finite volume community. Our main contribution is rather
   in pointing out a new physical effect than in the algorithmic part.

   Reply
7. 

   robotnikkkk says:

   January 11, 2015 at 3:16 AM

   @trich0m0nada =ВБШМММММ=ЛУЧБ ДУМЛИИИИИИИИИ=КАК БОРОЦЦА=А НЕ ЕТО=……..

   Reply
8. 

   robotnikkkk says:

   January 11, 2015 at 2:41 AM

   @trich0m0nada =ИДЕАЛНАА МОДЕЛЬ =КНЧНА
   ЖЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕ=………………………..=СЛБЕЕ =НО УСОЖЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕ =ПО
   КРЙНЕЙ МЕРЕ ЕСЬ ЕССЬ ККИЕНИТ СПОСБЫ УМНШИТЬ РЕЗАНАНС ТОООО МОНА ПРГНЗИРВВАТ
   ГДЕ ЖЕ ОПАСНАСТ ЦУНАМИ БУТ МНШШШШ ГДЕ=БЛШШШШШ =И ШО МОНА ЕСЬ МОНА ШОБ
   ПБЕДИТЬЬ ЦУНАМИ=…………….

   Reply
9. 

   lookang lawrence wee says:

   January 11, 2015 at 1:46 AM

   Is the file in silco shared ? Sharing the simulation in silco enhance your
   reach to audience , supports the academic paper and improves your
   hypothesis 🙂 For your consideration

   Reply
10. 

    Павел Гуров says:

    January 11, 2015 at 1:14 AM

    блин, пару лет по изучают еще и поймут, что за каждый раз откат она не
    сможет увеличиться, потому что частота скатывающихся волн всегда ниже
    частоты самих волн. Эффект резонанса получается только на каждой 4-10
    волне. Поэтому в реальной жизни цунами такими высокими не бывают. Пусть еще
    моделируют и на берегу посидят дольше!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.